A society of witches is commonly referred to as a coven. **A coven** is a group or gathering of witches who come together to practice their craft, share knowledge, and perform rituals and spells. The term coven is often associated with Wicca, a modern pagan religion that incorporates witchcraft and nature-based spirituality. However, covens can exist in various forms and traditions within witchcraft, including traditional witchcraft, eclectic witchcraft, and more. **Covens** provide a sense of community and support for witches, allowing them to connect and learn from one another. Within a coven, there is often a hierarchy or leadership structure with an experienced witch known as a High Priest or High Priestess who guides and oversees the activities of the coven.
Within a coven, there is often a hierarchy or leadership structure with an experienced witch known as a High Priest or High Priestess who guides and oversees the activities of the coven. Members of a coven may come together for regular gatherings, known as **esbats** during the full moon, and for special events or rituals during the seasonal sabbats, such as Samhain and Beltane. Covens can vary in size, with some being very small and intimate, while others may have a larger membership.
On Wandless Magic
Consider, for a moment, the “accidents” often done by premature wizards before they are accepted into magical schools. Take for example Harry’s trip to the zoo with the Dursleys when he made the glass between himself and the boa disappear. Or the time Harry made his Aunt Marge blow up like a balloon (actually that one Harry did in his third year, but he was under high-stress). These events proved random explosions of magic may exist in a witch or wizard despite relative magical control.
But that’s exactly my point, isn’t it? These spontaneous eruptions of magic in youth are examples of wandless magic.
It would follow, then, that wandless magic is primarily hard to cast because it is driven by emotion. Considering the range of emotions a human can hold, a spell meant for sparring could potentially kill someone.
Yes, because of its nature to act wildly, a wandless spell has the potential to be far more powerful than that of a spell done with a wand. And yet, unforgivable curses cannot be cast without one. Why? As we know of unforgiving curses, you have to “mean them.” Perhaps a wand not only provides a physical focus but a mental one as well, giving witches and wizards conscious control over their own influx of magic. Certainly a helpful tool, in the hands of an irrational killer.
Proof of the real danger of wandless magic may be revealed in the life of Ariana Dumbledore. A girl gifted with extraordinary magical prowess, Ariana’s temper was explosive – literally – and it was one of these explosions that killed her mother, Kendra.
There has been one significant application of wandless magic in the Harry Potter books, and it set the foundation for the entire plot ten years before Harry was accepted into Hogwarts: Lily Potter’s love.
When given the chance to save herself, Lily adamantly put herself between Voldemort and Harry and continuously pleaded, “Not Harry, please no, take me, kill me instead.” Blinded by this human devotion that he had never understood, Voldemort fiercely slew Lily – unknowingly triggering a very “old” magic.
Indeed, in an ultimate act of love, Lily sacrificed herself to save Harry. We might wonder if, considering her aptitude for charms, Lily knew Harry would have some sort of protection from Voldemort’s violence after she sacrificed herself. If she was aware, than she succeeded at consciously generating the wonders of wandless magic – an incredible feat considering the place where that magic pulls from.
Without a wand, compassion was the magical focus in this scene. On this occasion, Lily’s maternal instinct was strong and her emotions were singular. It was not only Lily who activated this bit of wandless magic. Voldemort played a key role by providing the proper situation for Lily’s magic to take effect.
The spell was so powerfull it stayed with Harry through all seven books, and presumably beyond. But this special protection did not diminish when Quirrel attacked in the first book, nor when Voldemort took Harry’s own blood to build his body. The latter – in fact – made the connection between Harry and Voldemort stronger. It strengthened the Priori Incantatem between the wands according to Dumbledore. It also allowed Harry to survive when faced with the Avada Kedavra spell for the second time.
According to Rowling's History of Magic in North America, wandless magic originated in the Native American wizarding community. Similar to what was established in Harry Potter, some members of the Native American community where magical, while others were deemed No-Majs. Those that practiced magic, however, were generally "gifted in animal and plant magic," with the ability to brew sophisticated potions "beyond much that was known in Europe" at the time -- and they did this all without the use of a wand.
The main focus of a coven is to foster spiritual growth, practice magic, and honor the natural world and its cycles. In recent years, the popularity of witchcraft and covens has grown, with many individuals seeking to find a community and explore their own magical abilities within a coven setting. Whether it's a traditional coven following ancient practices or a modern-day coven embracing a more eclectic approach, the idea of a society of witches coming together to share in their craft continues to hold a sense of mystery and intrigue within the broader society..
Reviews for "A Comprehensive Guide to Joining a Witch Coven"
1. John - 2/5 stars - I found "What is a society of witches called" to be quite disappointing. The concept of a society of witches seemed intriguing, but the execution fell flat for me. The story lacked depth and character development, making it difficult for me to connect with the protagonists. Additionally, the plot seemed rushed and lacked coherence, jumping from one event to another without proper explanation. Overall, I didn't find this book engaging or captivating, and it left me feeling unsatisfied.
2. Emma - 1/5 stars - "What is a society of witches called" was a complete waste of time. The writing style was repetitive and uninspiring, making it hard to focus and stay interested in the story. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked any real personality, making it hard to care about what happened to them. The plot was predictable and lacked originality, making it feel like I had read this story a hundred times before. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for an engaging and well-crafted story.
3. Sarah - 3/5 stars - "What is a society of witches called" had potential, but it didn't quite deliver for me. While the concept of a society of witches was intriguing, the execution left much to be desired. The pacing felt off, with some parts dragging on while others felt rushed. The characters were interesting, but I wished they had been more developed. Overall, it was an average read that didn't leave a lasting impression on me.